SRA-Europe Conference 2009 a success
 
 

From the Everyday to the Extraordinary: SRA-Europe Conference 2009

The 18th SRA Europe Annual meeting was held at Karlstad University in Sweden from 28th June – 1st July 2009. Over the course of the conference around 200 delegates from 24 countries attended and participated in a full programme of exciting keynotes, individual papers and symposia over 5 parallel sessions.

Assisting with the conference, SRA Europe were fortunate to enjoy the generous sponsorship of Karlstad University and the Swedish Defence College. All the delegates were very appreciative of these contributions and the efforts of the local organising committee led by Ann Enander, the incoming President of SRA-Europe.

We were welcomed to Karlstad by the County Governor as we enjoyed their hospitality overlooking the river Klara. The opening plenary took the form of a round table and the ensuing lively debate between Professors Ortwin Renn (Stuttgart University), Glynis Breakwell (University of Bath, UK) and Åsa Boholm (University of Gothenburg) set the tone for considering the conference theme: From the Everyday to the Extraordinary. Later that day participants had the opportunity to hear Dr. Johan Schaar, Head of the Secretariat of the Climate Commission on Climate Change and Development provide a keynote address: Living with Risk: Poverty in the era of Climate Change. One of the most thought provoking moments of the conference was provided by the keynote address of Paul Slovic who opened up the question of why it is that the more that die in atrocities the less it is that we care.

We were also pleased to welcome SRA leaders to the conference. Alison Cullen (President of SRA International), Roberto Bubbico (President SRA Europe), Esperanza Lopez (President, SRA Latin America) and Valery Lesnykh (Vice President, SRA Russia) took part in a discussion moderated by Olivier Salvi focusing on the challenges for the Society posed by the current financial crisis. Ahead of the China- Europe Risk Forum to be held in Beijing in October it was also good to welcome a delegation of participants from China.

A chartered train transported us through the beautiful Värmland countryside to Rottnerospark for the conference dinner. We had a wonderful dinner in the Hall of Mirrors overlooking the park lake. Afterwards, many delegates took the opportunity to explore the statues and gardens surrounding the manor house made famous in the works of the Nobel Prize winning author Selma Lagerlöf. We look forward to welcoming you to our next annual meeting at Kings College London from June 21st-23rd 2010 and to continued conversations over the next 12 months.

 
   
 
 
Conference 2009: General information
 
 

SRA Europe 2009 Annual MeetingConference 2009: General information

The 2009 SRA-Europe Annual Meeting will take place in Karlstad, Sweden.

The conference will start on Sunday evening 28th June with an opening reception and will last through until lunch Wednesday 1st July.

The conference language is English.

SRA members who choose to be affiliated to the SRA-Europe Regional Organization (40 dollars) when they renew their 2009 membership, will be entitled to a reduction of at least 50 dollars (currently around €37) on the conference fee.

 
   
 
 
SRA Europe 2009 Annual Meeting
 
 

From the everyday to the extraordinary: challenges for risk analysis and management

The SRA Europe Meeting in 2009 will be held from 28th June – 1st July in Karlstad, Sweden. The conference theme will span across the broad range of risk issues from everyday risks to extraordinary events. The conference aims to facilitate exchange of experiences from different disciplines, fields and application areas.

The call for papers to the conference has resulted in a very positive response. Over 150 abstracts and a number of interesting proposals for minisymposia have been submitted and the review process is under way. We are pleased to see so many European countries represented, as well as contributions from around the globe.

The plenary sessions will include both keynote adresses and round table discussions. Confirmed speakers so far include Professor Paul Slovic, Professor Ortwin Renn, Professor Glynis Breakwell and Professor Åsa Boholm.

Registration for the conference will open on April 1st and full details will be available here on the website. Remember: SRA members who choose to be affiliated to the SRA-Europe Regional Organization (40 dollars) when they renew their 2009 membership, will receive a reduction equivalent to at least 50 dollars on the conference fee.

Please direct any questions to the local organiser at sraeurope2009@fhs.se

 
   
 
 
Submission of abstracts
 
 

Submission of abstracts

Authors wishing to present their work at the conference in the form of an oral presentation, poster, round table discussion or symposium are requested to submit an abstract no later than January 12th 2009. Abstracts for indiividual papers and posters should be submitted electronically, by filling out the abstract submission form.

Symposium and round table abstracts can be submitted by contacting the local organiser at sraeurope2009@fhs.se

The abstract of an oral presentation or poster should be 250 words maximum and include specific field of interest, issues addressed, methodology applied and results achieved or expected. Abstracts for symposia or round-table discussions should not exceed 800 words. Full mail and e-mail address of the corresponding author should be provided for future contacts.

Authors whose abstracts have been accepted will be expected to attend the conference and present their work in person. Oral presentations will last approximately 20 minutes.

Abstracts and proposals will be reviewed by the Technical Program Committee. Upon acceptance authors will be notified by March 2nd, 2009. The final program schedule will be available at the beginning of May 2009.

Please direct any questions to the local organiser at sraeurope2009@fhs.se

 
   
 
 
Conference book with final programme available
 
 

Conference book and activities

The conference book with final programme and abstracts (.pdf, sized 1.2 MB) can be downloaded here now. A printed version will be included in the conference pack for all participants.

 
   
 
 
Conference theme, aims and topics
 
 

Conference theme, aims and topics

The Society for Risk Analysis (SRA) is a multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, scholarly international society that provides an open forum for all those who are interested in risk analysis. Risk analysis is broadly defined to include risk assessment, risk characterization, risk communication and perception, risk management and risk policy. It may concern individuals, public and private organizations, and society at a local regional, national or global level. SRA-Europe is a regional organization of the Society for Risk Analysis.

The 2009 conference of SRA-Europe will take place in Karlstad, Sweden. The conference theme will span across a broad range of issues from everyday risks to extraordinary events. The conference aims to provide a forum for traditional SRA themes such as risk identification, quantification and mitigation, risk perception and communication, policy making and legislation, as well as opening up for new risk-related topics. The conference aims to facilitate interaction among all players in the risk field: risk experts from all disciplines, and risk stakeholders as policy makers, the private sector, NGOs and other interest groups.

The conference will be a forum for presentations on existing and emerging risk issues, from all related research disciplines. Presentations in the following areas are particularly welcomed:

  • Everyday risks and prevention of injuries.
    Issues here include identification and analysis of major determinants of injury mortality and morbidity and analysis of achievements in safety related work.
  • Management of natural risk and climate change.
    From a European perspective, the major consequences of climate change will be negative. Vulnerability analyses, risk and disaster management strategies and conditions for learning and developing warning systems are pertinent topics here.
  • Disaster risk management in an international context.
    This theme addresses the role of European stakeholders in supporting safe and secure societal systems in the developing world and the possible contributions of risk oriented research.
  • Future risks and technologies for security and safety.
    The growing dependence on technical systems in critical infrastructures has resulted in growing risks in society. This theme calls for security risk assessment methods and experiences that contribute to increased confidence in and understanding of such technologies.
 
   
 
 
Conference activities
 
 

Conference activities


The conference will start on Sunday evening 28th June with an opening reception and will last through until lunch Wednesday 1st July. The conference language is English.

The opening reception will be hosted by the County Governor at the Elite Stadshotellet (next to the Governor´s residence in the centre of the city).

Each conference day will open up with a plenary session with keynote presentations and discussions, followed by parallel sessions including oral papers, round table discussions and symposia reflecting particular themes of interest. Professor Paul Slovic will give a keynote talk: "The more who die, the less we care: Confronting psychic numbing". Other confirmed speakers thus far include Professor Ortwin Renn, Professor Glynis Breakwell and Professor Åsa Boholm. A special drinks and buffet poster session is planned on Monday evening.

A conference dinner will provide the delegates with an opportunity to enjoy the beautiful countryside and midsummer light in the county of Värmland. The conference dinner will be held on Tuesday evening. Taking us back in time, a steam locomotive will take our chartered train through the beautiful Värmland countryside to Rottnerospark. Overlooking lake Fryken, the park is renowned for its statues and gardens which surround the manorhouse made famous in the works of the Nobel Prize winning author Selma Lagerlöf. The dinner will be held in the Hall of Mirrors overlooking the park lake, giving delegates the opportunity to enjoy the midsummer light in beautiful surroundings.

 
   
 
 
Day by day programme outline
 
 

Day by day programme outline


Sunday 28th June

The conference will start with an informal evening reception hosted by the County Governor at the Elite Stadshotellet (close to the Governor´s residence in the centre of the city).

Monday 29th June

9.00 – 10.30 Plenary opening session
Round table plenary with invited speakers
11.00 – 12.30 Minisymposia, paper presentations and discussions (parallel sessions)
13.30 – 14.15 Keynote address
14.30 – 18.00 Minisymposia, paper presentations and discussions (parallel sessions)
18.00 – 19.30 Poster session, buffet refreshments hosted by the City of Karlstad

Tuesday 30th June

9.00 – 10.30 Plenary session: Keynote addresses
11.00 – 12.30 Minisymposia, paper presentations and discussions (parallel sessions)
13.30 – 15.00 Minisymposia, paper presentations and discussions (parallel sessions)
15.30 – 17.00 Plenary session: International round table
18.15 Assembly at the railway station for transport to conference dinner, Rottneros park

Wednesday 1st July

9.00 – 12.30 Minisymposia, paper presentations and discussions (parallel sessions)
12.30 – 14.00 Closing lunch

The conference book with the final detailed schedule can be downloaded here.

 
   
 
 
Plenary sessions 2009 Annual Meeting
 
 

Plenary sessions 2009 Annual Meeting

Monday and Tuesday will each open up with a plenary session with keynote presentations and discussions. During both days, a second plenary session will take place.

On the Monday a round table with presentations and discussions will highlight the overall theme, ‘from the everyday to the extraordinary’, with contributions from Professor Ortwin Renn, Professor Glynis Breakwell and Professor Åsa Boholm.

In the afternoon, Dr. Johan Schaar, Head of the Secretariat of the Climate Commission on Climate Change and Development will provide insights from the then newly released final report of the Commission (upcoming in May 2009).

In the plenary session on Tuesday Professor Paul Slovic will give a keynote talk: "The more who die, the less we care: Confronting psychic numbing".

The final plenary session will focus on the challenges of shared international issues with contributions from prominent SRA leaders including Alison Cullen, Olivier Salvi and Daniela Leonte.

 
   
 
 
Symposia and round table sessions
 
 

Outlines for mini-symposia and round table sessions


The following mini-symposia and round table sessions will take place at the Annual Meeting 2009 in Karlstad:


Symposium: Visualisation of Risk: Opportunities for Public Engagement and Communication

Monday 29th June 11.00-12.30

Aim:

Visual imagery is a prominent aspect of contemporary culture. Every time we read a newspaper, turn on the TV or browse the internet we are continually bombarded with visual information. This in turn is likely to influence how individuals use visual information to engage with and understand complex risk issues. The social sciences, however, have yet to majorly engage with the impact of visuals on the way people think about their worlds. As a consequence, there is growing empirical interest exploring the role this information has for both understanding and communication of risk. It is also important, at a more theoretical level, to identify how visual information is used given the strong affective component researchers attribute risk perception processes. Does visual imagery ‘position’ individuals to respond and think about risk in particular ways? What emotions are associated when viewing one image over another? Can seeing really mean believing? The aim of this symposium is to bring together researchers to investigate these questions. Presentations will address a variety of risks but all have a specific interest in visual imagery and visualisation of risk more broadly.

Presentations:

  • Disgust, imagery, and precautionary advice: Their impact on the risk perceptions of being bitten by ticks.
    Julie Barnett, Afrodita Marcu & Anna Mikolajek, University of Surrey, UK
  • The power of visual material: persuasion, emotion and identification.
    Helene Joffe, University College London, UK
  • Using visual imagery to communicate global warming risk.
    Nicholas Smith, University College London, UK
  • Social representations of ticks in words vs. images: A multiple sorting procedure approach
    Afrodita Marcu, Julie Barnett & Marta Brodzinska, University of Surrey
  • Envisioning engagement: a longitudinal study of representations of renewable energy technologies within UK newspapers.
    Hannah Devine-Wright, University of Manchester, UK

Top of Page


Risk Psychology, Environment and Safety: The RIPENSA-symposium

Monday 28th June 14.30-16.00 and continued 16.30-18.00

Abstract

The presentations and discussions in this symposium cover recent research results from risk psychology, environment and safety reflecting the broad scope of the RIPENSA research team’s collaboration and production. The scope involves individuals’ everyday risks, emotions, reactions and behaviour, studies of collective actions or community reactions related to risk and safety issues, health outcomes in social interaction and work environments as well as behaviours in the face of global environmental, or security, threats. The RIPENSA team aims at specialisation as well as collaboration to produce insights and practices of complementary aspects to risk, environmental and safety issues. Therefore the approaches include the development of basic theory related to various theoretical perspectives, a broad range of utilized methodologies, and experimental as well as empirical testing and fields studies.

In the first paper Lennart Sjöberg focuses on emotions and the current conceptual confusion regarding the definitions of central concepts used to explain human reactions and behaviour in relation to central risk perception theories. In the following paper Christian Klöckner outlines driving forces behind human decision-making and action. He links the Comprehensive Action Determination Model (CADM) to how individuals relate to the risk of climate change and decide on the actions they want to take. Mons Bendixen and Ute Gabriel present results on how sexual risk behaviour and sexual harassment relate to health outcomes in young people. The sexual risk – health outcome association is of central interest in the study. In the following paper Marit Christensen outlines how downsizing in a cornerstone industry, internal reorganisation and aspects of the psychosocial environment affect employees’ job satisfaction in community services. She points out the varying importance of psychosocial factors for job satisfaction in different work circumstances. Tone Aasen and Gunhild Åm Vatn report from a field study which investigated neighbours’ concerns regarding a refuse incineration plant and suggested plans to increase the capacity of the facility. They point at health concerns, but also to concerns involving noice, smell, traffic, safety and esthetics. Britt-Marie Drottz-Sjöberg and Jørn Vatn present community reactions to a planned liquefied natural gas (LNG) industrial application. The suggested placement of a LNG storage tank in a harbour area, together with scarce initial risk anlysis and public information, as well as highlighted media reports developed concerns about public safety as well as about the procedural handling of the process. J. Peter Burgess focuses on how security is financed, and discusses how costs and values are linked on the basis of a 2004 European Union report. How do European agencies make the calculation that permits them to put a price on human life and to differentiate that cost from one European member state to another?

These presentations and questions provide some input to the following discussion in the session. In highlighting examples from different perspectives we wish to embrace the complexity of real life situations and reflect the many important dimensions of the RIPENSA arena, e.g. individuals’ perceptions and reactions in large or collective systems, the functions of emotions and values in individual as well as international and global decision-making and policy, the interrelationsships between risk estimates or analysis and social systems and cultural frameworks.

Chair: Britt-Marie Drottz-Sjöberg

Presentations:

  • The Place of Emotions in a World of Risks.
    Lennart Sjöberg, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden
  • Understanding the Driving Forces behind Climate Behaviour of Individuals.
    Christian Klöckner, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
  • Sexual Risk Behavior, Sexual Harassment and Health Outcomes.
    Mons Bendixen & Ute Gabriel, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway. mons.bendixen@svt.ntnu.no ; ute.gabriel@svt.ntnu.no
  • Job Satisfaction and Perceived Risks in Municipality Services related to Reorganization and Downsizing.
    Marit Christensen, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology,Norway marit.christensen@svt.ntnu.no
  • Concerned Neighbours to a refuse Incineration Plant.
    Tone Aasen, NTNU, Department of Psychology,N-7491 Trondheim, Norway. Tone.aasen@svt.ntnu.no
    Gunhild Åm Vatn, Language and Communication Studies, NTNU. University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway Gunhild.vatn@hf.ntnu.no
  • Community Reactions to the Development of a LNG Plant
    Britt-Marie Drottz-Sjöberg, Risk Psychology, Environment and Safety, RIPENSA, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway.
    Jørn Vatn, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
  • The cost of danger and value of security: The EU study on aviation security financing
    J. Peter Burgess, RIPENSA

Top of Page


Round Table: Siting sensitive projects

Tuesday 30th June 11.00-12.30

Aim:

The roundtable will describe how social acceptance in sensitive industrial projects is a key success factor which must be properly managed and cautiously looked after. Anyway, social acceptance relies both over legal regulations and social options to be set up and followed up by public authorities on a case by case basis. The subject will be tackled through a comparison of partnerships developed in Belgium and Slovenia in order to site a repository for low and medium- level short-leved waste  (LILW)  and a cross examination with a French case of siting a different industry, rendering plant, also with a local partnership.

The roundtable will be an opportunity to :

  • present general context, technical background and choices in siting two similar sensitive projects of radioactive waste management :  disposal of low and medium-level short-lived waste  (LILW) in two countries, Belgium and Slovenia,
  • comparing some steps and key issues with an other kind of sensitive project, a rendering plant in France,
  • present expectations  from a local partnership representative view point
  • draw comparisons and common good practices in managing such upstream part of a technical project.

Participants

  • Nadja Železnik, ARAO  (Slovenia) :              
  • Evelyn Hooft , NIRAS/ONDRAF (Belgium) :        
  • Jean-François David, Compagnie Nationale des Experts de Justice en Environnement:   (France)
  • Stakeholder representative (local Belgian partnership) to be determined

The steps of the round table will link up as follows:

STEP 1 : Context and history

From hard science to soft science, from technology to social expertise, listening and understanding, how to insert soft sciences in a technical project and how to listen to citizens. Building local partnerships are well recognized frameworks for involvement and participation of local stakeholders ; those partnership obey to several steps developing inside pre established frameworks which will be described.

Presentations

  • Belgian experience and model: Evelyn Hooft
  • Slovenian experience and model: Nadja Železnik
  • French experience, a rendering plant needing to be relocated outside a urban area: Jean-François David

STEP 2 : Social and political approach along with local partnership

The history and live of partnerships  will be described in a comparative approach with rule of the games, mutual apprenticeship between public agencies and local partners, pros and cons, process description. A SWOT analysis will be presented for both projects to back the comparison and make it more understandable, stressing the differences and similarities. The typology and number of partners, the mapping of their social expectations will be described.

Presentations

  • Belgian experience : 
  • NIRAS/ONDRAF: Evelyn Hooft
  • Why did we accept the partnership:  a local stakeholder (local Belgian partnership)
  • Slovenian experience Nadja Železnik

STEP 3 : Lessons learned

From SWOT analysis, the results for each partnership will be considered : what type of recognition, both at local level and at governmental leve,l for each project, purposes and roadmap. Process calendar and time spans will  also be subjects of comparisons. Differences and common rules will be drawn from those different approaches and siting processes. Beyond that keys success factors and pitfalls will be listed.

Some key success factors :

  • local and national involvement in future projects
  • freedom and wide access of stakeholders, fulfilling their expectations
  • keeping the balance between a project management system and a loose schedule : no hurry, we can listen to everybody  and prepare sound answers
  • keeping at bay predetermined scientific and technical imperialism.

Pitfalls to avoid :

  • conflicting leaderships,
  • a weak communication scheme.

Presentations:

  • Slovenian experience: Nadja Železnik
  • Belgian experience:  Evely Hooft and local stake holder
  • Cross examination through French experience: Jean-François David

Top of Page


Symposium: Results of the International Study of the Effects of Information about Precautionary Measures on Risk Perceptions of Mobile Telephony (ISEP)

Tuesday 30th June 11.00-12.30

Symposium Authors (in alphabetical order): Alvarez J, Barnett J, Boerner F, Clauberg M, Croft R, da Silva Medeiros FN, de Villiers B, Diaz A, Gutteling JM, Kemp R, Kikkawa T, Schuetz H, Shukla R, Wiedemann PM

Symposium Presenters (in chronological order): Peter Wiedemann, Julie Barnett, Rodney Croft, Flavia Natércia da Silva Medeiros, (Martin Clauberg and/or Franziska Boerner –as facilitator(s) for a discussion round at the end of the presentations)

Symposium Abstract:

When risks are unclear or highly controversial, precautionary measures are called for to reduce the potential for risks and also oftentimes to primarily affect risk perceptions. Understanding how risk perceptions are influenced by precautionary measures is a critical component of the efforts to improve risk communication strategies and, indeed, risk management practices. In a multi-national (9 +3 nation) research project, survey experimental studies were performed to obtain crucial scientific data related to understanding trust, risk and benefit perception of mobile communication technology by the general public in regards to the issue of precautionary measures towards both mobile phones and base stations. Contrary to the prevailing assumption that implementation of precautionary measures, or more precisely communicating or informing about taking such precautionary measures, will increase trust, alleviate fears, and reduce risk perceptions in the general public, previous findings from Western & Middle European countries indicated that the opposite effect may be observed. Preliminary data analyses for the ISEP study in these countries support the previous observations. Various theoretical hypotheses may be posited to explain this countervailing effect. To verify whether this effect holds true across larger sample sizes and across different cultures and countries, an international comparative study was performed in nine countries using a standardized survey instrument that, however, was culturally adapted. Initial comparative analyses indicate that a countervailing effect may not be observed in all the ISEP partner nations. Survey variables included the information about the level of precautionary measure, the basic intention behind implementing it, and the order of addressing base stations and mobile phones. Respondents rated their perceived risks, organizational trust, and benefits, and in addition self-reporting their own mobile phone usage patterns. The international results are comparatively presented in four talks that provide a project overview with discussions of the coordinated sampling and data collection approach, followed by separate presentations of the comparative findings for the perception of risk, trust, and benefits. The implications of the results are not only important for improving the understanding of risk perception and risk communication, but may have significant ramifications for risk management.

Abstract 1

Title: International Study of the Effects of information about Precautionary measures on risk perceptions of mobile telephony (ISEP): Project overview, coordinated sampling approach, and international comparisons.

Authors (in alphabetical order): Alvarez J, Barnett J, Boerner F, Clauberg M, Croft R, da Silva Medeiros FN, de Villiers B, Diaz A, Gutteling JM, Kemp R, Kikkawa T, Schuetz H, Shukla R, Wiedemann PM*

Abstract 2

Title: International Study of the Effects of information about Precautionary measures on risk perceptions of mobile telephony (ISEP): Effects of survey experimental variables on risk perceptions and international comparisons.

Authors: Alvarez J, Barnett J*, Boerner F, Clauberg M, Croft R, da Silva Medeiros FN, de Villiers B, Diaz A, Gutteling JM, Kemp R, Kikkawa T, Schuetz H, Shukla R, Wiedemann PM

Abstract 3

Title: International Study of the Effects of information about Precautionary measures on risk perceptions of mobile telephony (ISEP): Variations in organizational trust as function of survey experimental variables.

Authors: Alvarez J, Barnett J, Boerner F, Clauberg M, Croft R*, da Silva Medeiros FN, de Villiers B, Diaz A, Gutteling JM, Kemp R, Kikkawa T, Schuetz H, Shukla R, Wiedemann PM

Abstract 4

Title: International Study of the Effects of information about Precautionary measures on risk perceptions of mobile telephony (ISEP): Benefit perceptions and usage patterns and their correlation to risk perception in international comparison.

Authors: Alvarez J, Barnett J, Boerner F, Clauberg M, Croft R, da Silva Medeiros FN*, de Villiers B, Diaz A, Gutteling JM, Kemp R, Kikkawa T, Schuetz H, Shukla R, Wiedemann PM

* Presenting author



Top of page


An Information Assurance Perspective on future Risks with Technologies for Security and Safety

Tuesday 30th June 13.30-15.00

The growing dependence on, and interconnection of, technical systems in critical infrastructures has resulted in growing risks in society. One of the emerging issues is the intertwining of security and safety. The classic approach to risk assessment of single systems is no longer applicable as highly complex systems of systems are created. This, for instance, raises new challenges on information assurance and hence calls for novel security risk assessment methods that contribute to increased confidence in and understanding of such technologies.

Moderator: Daniel Haglund, MSB

Presenters:

  • Åke J Holmgren, MSB information assurance section
  • Erland Jonsson, Chalmers University of Technology
  • Jan Skogqvist, IT auditor, Handelsbanken

Top of page


Education Symposium of the SRA Education Committee

Wednesday 1st July  9.00-10.30

This symposium proposal is focused on the education initiatives of the Society for Risk Analysis’ Education Committee (EduComm) and will present the initiatives of the SRA’s EduComm as well as supported education-based presentations. The symposium is comprised of an overview of accomplished as well as ongoing and upcoming initiatives. In addition, three (3) standalone presentations of education-related topics will be presented. A final discussion round will allow the audience to discuss risk-educational topics of interest.

Symposium Authors (in alphabetical order): Luis Cifuentes, Martin Clauberg, Leah Corr, David Hassenzahl, Garrick Louis, Tomas Oeberg, Carolyn Ross, Brandolyn Thran, John Watt, Peter Wiedemann

Symposium Presenters (in chronological order): Martin Clauberg, Tomas Öberg, Peter Wiedemann

Symposium abstract

The Education Committee (EduComm) of the Society for Risk Analysis (SRA) has been chartered since December 2006 with the mission to “… provide guidance and support for individuals and institutions interested in teaching or learning risk analysis methods”. It is comprised of 20+ SRA members that have a common goal of fostering the educational resources and opportunities of the SRA membership and reaching out to students and teachers of risk analysis at all levels, from Kindergarten to University and beyond to adult professional training. This symposium will introduce the SRA EduComm and its ongoing and upcoming activities, with a focus on how participants can draw upon the resources and become involved in the activities of the EduComm.

After an overview of the goals and constitutive membership of the EduComm, a brief review of the accomplished initiatives of the EduComm will be followed by presentations of the ongoing and upcoming initiatives, which will be followed by three sponsored presentations of examples of European risk education perspectives. Accomplished projects include establishment of general risk analysis training workshops at Annual Meetings of SRA in the US and development of video excerpts of these workshops, coordination of symposia at various SRA meetings, and completion of data collection of a member survey on risk education programmes. Upcoming and ongoing initiatives include the First Risk Analysis in Education Conference in Reno, Nevada, USA on July 13-15th, 2009 and the development of a collection of online risk tutorials, among other activities of the EduComm. These latter initiatives will be presented in depth.

The results of the SRA Membership Survey on Risk Education Programmes will be presented and discussed in full detail in one of three standalone presentations of examples of European risk education perspectives. A presentation of a Swedish experience in teaching the concepts of variability and uncertainty in environmental risk analysis will provide insights into the challenges and approaches for university-based teaching. The third standalone presentation will focus on risk communication training in Germany from a theoretical and practical perspective. A final group / panel discussion round will allow for a free exchange of information and an opportunity for EduComm presenters to share their resource suggestions and address audience questions.  

Individual presentation titles:

  • Overview and development of First Risk Analysis in Education Conference and collection of online risk tutorials.
  • Insights into the future of risk education from a survey of SRA members.
  • Experience in teaching the concepts of variability and uncertainty in environmental risk analysis.
  • Challenges for institutional education of risk communication for organizations in Germany.
  • Group / panel discussion.

Top of page


Symposium: Framing Climate Change and Energy Futures

Wednesday 1st July 11.00-12.30

Discussant: Nick Pidgeon, Cardiff University

Contributors:

  • Alexa Spence, Cardiff University,
  • Chris Jones, University of Sheffield,
  • Dan Venables, Cardiff University,
  • Karen Parkhill, Cardiff University

Climate change is an increasingly critical issue around the world and major changes within energy generation in Europe will be required in order to meet the related domestic carbon emission targets that have been set.  Public support is important in the successful risk management of related policy decisions and therefore the way that these public issues are debated, communicated and decided upon is crucial.  This symposium will examine public perceptions of climate change and energy futures within Britain, in particular considering the importance of the impact of framing on these perceptions.  The way that an issue is framed can have an important impact on perceptions and, for this reason, communications from stakeholders such as the government and energy companies have been scrutinised and at times criticised for the framings that they have employed.  Each of the papers presented as part of this symposium considers the impact of different frames on the way that climate change and energy sources are perceived.

Chris Jones will outline research that experimentally examined the impact of framing on the comparative favourability of nuclear power within Britain’s electricity generating mix.  Four different frames were utilised here, two pro-nuclear frames (climate change mitigation and increasing the security of energy supplies), one anti-nuclear frame (nuclear waste) and one neutral frame (how nuclear power produces electricity).  Participants were provided with textual information relating to one of these four frames before deciding the respective contributions that five key energy sources (coal, gas, nuclear, renewables, and electricity import) should make towards Britain’s electricity demand.  Participants then answered a series of questions assessing related socio-cognitive constructs including attitudes and beliefs about nuclear power.  Results indicated that whilst renewables were the most favoured of energy sources, framing had a significant impact on constructs measured; in particular the climate change mitigation frame appeared to increase support for future use of nuclear power.

A second experimental examination of framing will be presented by Alexa Spence however this paper focuses on framing climate change.  This research examined how framing climate change in terms of gain or loss outcomes or in terms of personal relevance can impact related perceptions.  Here, climate change was framed using text adapted from the most recent IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) report on climate change impacts, modified to focus either on losses from climate change or gains from climate change mitigation.  In addition to this further text was utilised, alongside maps and images, in order to focus participants on either the personally relevant local or less personally relevant distant impacts of climate change.  Participants then completed measures of various relevant socio-cognitive factors and questions assessing their responses to the information that they had received.  Results indicated that the way that climate change is framed has important effects on the way that it is perceived and has significant implications for the way that climate change should be presented in different contexts.

Continuing the theme of concern about climate change, risk perception, and energy choices, Dan Venables will outline some of the results from a major questionnaire survey, conducted in summer 2008 with two communities situated in close proximity to a nuclear power station.  The questionnaire incorporated a scale designed to measure place attachment, alongside indicators of environmental concern, individual risk perceptions, trust, attitudes, and risk-benefit judgements in relation to the nearby nuclear power station.  Associations between key variables and constructs will be discussed with reference to factors such as place attachment, concern about climate change, and risk-benefit judgements with regard to the nearby nuclear power station.   The results have implications both for existing theory and for current policy on the building and siting of new nuclear power stations in the UK.

Karen Parkhill continues this theme with a further analysis of the way that proximity, space and place have an influence on perceptions of nuclear power risks.  Using biographical and narrative data, the way in which local residents living close to two nuclear power stations in the UK (Bradwell, Essex and Oldbury, South Gloucestershire) have come to view their local nuclear power station is explored. The interpretive, qualitative (thematic and discourse) analysis reveals how perceptions of the station are constructed through processes of familiarisation and/or the normalisation/normification of risk as part of everyday life.  The ordinariness of the power station is juxtaposed with moments of extraordinariness (the “nuclear uncanny”) in which due to direct and mediated events the power station is reconstructed as a risk issue leading to moments of anxiety which ebb and flow through interviewees’ lives.  Findings suggest that (nuclear) risk or ideas of what constitutes a possible threat, is open to renegotiation dependent on socio-cultural, political, geographical and biographical influences.  The significance of climate change and energy security discourses to interviewees’ perceptions of the local nuclear power stations will also be discussed.


Top of page

 
   
 
 
Guidelines for posters
 
 

Guidelines for posters


Poster boards will be available for posters size 100 cm (height)  x 70 cm (breadth).

 
   
 
 
Registration for the 2009 SRA Annual Meeting is now open
 
 

Registration is now open for the 2009 SRA Annual Meeting to be held in Karlstad from 28th June – 1st July. 


THE CONFERENCE PROGRAMME

We are delighted to be able to welcome several well known scholars to give plenary papers each morning.  On the Monday a round table with presentations and discussions will highlight the overall theme, ‘from the everyday to the extraordinary’, with contributions from Professors Ortwin Renn,  Glynis Breakwell and Åsa Boholm.  In the plenary session on Tuesday Professor Paul Slovic will give a keynote talk: "The more who die, the less we care: Confronting psychic numbing".  In the same session Dr Johan Schaar, Head of the Secretariat of the Climate Commission on Climate Change and Development will provide insights from the then newly released final report of the Commission (upcoming in May 2009). The final plenary session will focus on the challenges of shared international issues with contributions from prominent SRA leaders including Alison Cullen, Olivier Salvi and Daniela Leonte.

The conference programme includes over 150 individual papers and eight mini symposia covering a range of significant topics. Posters will be displayed during a special session, with refreshments hosted by the city of Karlstad.  In addition to this reception, other social highlights of the conference include a reception at the regional governors residence and  a chartered trip with steam locomotive through the countryside and the conference dinner at Rottneros park, famous from the works of the Nobel laureate Selma Lagerlöf.


BOOKING FOR THE CONFERENCE

As previously promised, there is a substantial discount in fees for those that are SRA-Europe members.  SRA members who affiliated to the SRA-Europe Regional Organization when they renew their 2009 membership (which costs $40 - approximately €30), will receive a reduction of 800 SEK (equivalent to around  €74) on the conference fee.  It is not too late to benefit from this discount.  If you have not renewed your 2009 membership, or indeed if you wish to become a SRA member for the first time, you can do this on the SRA website now.   Be sure to select the box to affiliate to SRA Europe - and you are then entitled to register at the Karlstad meeting for the reduced fee. Please note that the deadline for early bird registration is 15th May.

We are very grateful for the sponsors of the Karlstad meeting – The Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency, The Swedish National Defence College and Karlstad University - whose generous contributions have enabled us to keep the fees  for this Annual Meeting and to offer this substantial discount to SRA Europe members. 

We very much look forward to welcoming you to Karlstad. 

 
   
 
 
Conference location
 
 

Conference location


The conference will be held at the University of Karlstad, which located by the lake Vänern in the region of Värmland, on about equal distance from Stockholm, Göteborg and Oslo. The region is noted for its beautiful scenery and rich cultural heritage.

The campus of the Karlstad University is located in suburban surroundings, approximately 7 kilometers from the city centre. It is famous for its Auditorium, which is also called "The Egg" due to its shape, floating in midair in a spacious surrounding.

For more information about the city of Karlstad and the county of Värmland please contact the Karlstad tourist office ( Tourist office ).


















"The Egg"
 
   
 
 
Conference Studentship Scholarships
 
 

Student Karlstad Conference Scholarship


We are pleased to announce two Student Karlstad Conference Scholarships each worth €500.

Students wishing to apply for a Scholarship are required to submit

  • an extended abstract (up to 800 words),
  • a short CV( no more than1 side A4) and 
  • a description of their motivation for wishing to attend the conference.
This information should be provided in a single document. A letter of support from their supervisor should also be sent. These two documents should be attached to an email to the local organiser as sraeurope2009@fhs.se. Please put  ‘Student Karlstad Conference Scholarships’ in the subject line.

The applications will be assessed by an Awards Committee. Each application will be rated for (1) quality of research (2) relevance to Karlstad conference themes (3) motivation for application.  The successful candidates will be required to submit proof of their student status before the award can be made. 

Applications for Student Karlstad Conference Scholarships should be submitted by 31st January 2009.  The successful candidates will be informed by 31st March 2009. On production of receipts they will be reimbursed for costs of economy travel, registration and accommodation up to the value of €500.

 
   
 
 
Student Scholarship Awarded
 
 

Student Scholarship Awarded


Karlstad Conference Studentship Scholarships (each worth €500) have been awarded to:

• Corinne Moser, ETH Zürich, Natural and Social Science Interface.

  Conference presentation (Parallel session, C3)
  Corinne Moser, Michael Stauffacher, Pius Krütli, & Roland W.Scholz.
  How do we perceive one million years? A qualitative investigation of time
  in risk perception of nuclear waste disposal

• Nicholas Smith, University College London

  Conference presentation (Symposium S1, A5)
  Nicholas Smith.
  Using visual imagery to communicate global warming risk


Awards committee:Julie Barnett (Chair), Margôt Kuttschreuter,Lars Nyberg, Richard Shepherd.
 
   
 
 
Organisation and support
 
 

Organisation and support


We are very grateful for the sponsors to the Karlstad conference whose generous contributions have enabled us to keep the fees for this Annual Meeting low and to offer a substantial discount to SRA Europe supporting members.


Sponsors


The SRA-Europe 2009 Conference is supported and co-hosted b

  • the Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB), 
  • Karlstad University (KaU) and
  • the Swedish National Defence College (SNDC).

The following organizations have also contributed sponsorship to the conference:
  • The Municipality of Karlstad
  • The County Administrative Board of Värmland
  • The Journal of Risk Research


Local Organizing Committee


  • Ann Enander, SNDC (Chair)
  • Lennart Blomquist (KaU)
  • Susanne Hede (SNDC)
  • Agne Sandberg (MSB)
  • Svante Ödman (MSB)

  • sraeurope2009@fhs.se

Conference Secretariat:

  • Maria Josteus
  • Lena Malmberg

  • Karlstad University Conference Administration
    SE-651 88 Karlstad
    Phone: +46 54 700 18 06

    Fax: +46 54 700 19 64
    conference@kau.se